Research Article

Teachers’ Conceptual Difficulties in Teaching Senior High School Organic Chemistry

Kenneth Adu-Gyamfi 1 * , Isaiah Atewini Asaki 1
More Detail
1 Department of Science Education, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, GHANA* Corresponding Author
Contemporary Mathematics and Science Education, 3(2), July 2022, ep22019, https://doi.org/10.30935/conmaths/12382
Submitted: 20 May 2022, Published: 19 August 2022
OPEN ACCESS   2378 Views   1986 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

Teachers are one of the important factors influencing students’ learning of chemistry as they (teachers) transform the content for students. When teachers do not have a sound scientific understanding of the chemistry behind the organic concepts considered to be difficult, they are likely, not able to transform sound scientific understanding for their students. Hence, the need to examine the conceptual difficulties of teachers in teaching organic chemistry to senior high school students. Teachers, teaching chemistry in 31 schools were sampled through multi-stage sampling procedures and responded to a diagnostic test on organic chemistry. The data from the test were manipulated using quantitative and qualitative methods, such as means, standard deviations, percentages, and themes. The quantitative results were merged with the qualitative results to examine teachers’ conceptual difficulties in organic chemistry. The findings showed that teachers have conceptual difficulties with organic chemistry. This study has added to the literature that teacher conceptual difficulties were partial understanding with misconceptions such as preconceived notions, factual misconceptions, and conceptual misunderstandings. Therefore, in order to deal with those misconceptions, chemistry educators should implement instructional approaches that will help pre-service teachers challenge and deal with their misconceptions in organic chemistry.
Keywords: conceptual difficulties, misconceptions, organic chemistry, teachers

CITATION (APA)

Adu-Gyamfi, K., & Asaki, I. A. (2022). Teachers’ Conceptual Difficulties in Teaching Senior High School Organic Chemistry. Contemporary Mathematics and Science Education, 3(2), ep22019. https://doi.org/10.30935/conmaths/12382

REFERENCES

  1. Abreh, M. K. (2018). Heads of departments’ perception of teachers’ participation in continuous professional development programs and its influence on science and mathematics teaching in Ghanaian secondary schools African. Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics and Sciences, 14, 85-99.
  2. Adu-Gyamfi, K., & Ampiah, J. G. (2019). Students’ alternative conceptions associated with application of redox reactions in everyday life. Asian Education Studies, 4(1), 29-38. https://doi.org/10.20849/aes.v4i1.590
  3. Adu-Gyamfi, K., Ampiah, J. G., & Agyei, D. D. (2020). Participatory teaching and learning approach. A framework for teaching redox reactions at the high school level. International Journal of Education and Practice, 8(1), 106-120. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2020.81.106.120
  4. Adu-Gyamfi, K., Ampiah, J. G., & Appiah, J. Y. (2012). Senior high school students’ difficulties in writing structural formulae of organic compounds. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6(1), 175-191.
  5. Adu-Gyamfi, K., Ampiah, J. G., & Appiah, J. Y. (2017). Students’ difficulty in IUPAC naming of organic compounds. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6(2), 77-106.
  6. Ameyibor, K., & Wiredu, M. B. (2006). Chemistry for senior secondary schools. Unimax Publishers Ltd.
  7. Anci, F. F., Paristiowati, M., Budi, S., Tritiyatma, H., & Fitriani, E. (2021). Development of TPACK of chemistry teacher on electrolyte and non-electrolyte topic through lesson study. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2331. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0041804
  8. Anim-Eduful, B., & Adu-Gyamfi, K. (2021). Functional groups detection: Do chemistry teachers demonstrate conceptual difficulties in teaching? Global Journal of Human-Social Science: G Linguistics & Education, 21(7), 47-60. https://doi.org/10.34257/GJHSSGVOL21IS7PG47
  9. Araujo, V. K. S., & Santos J. C. O. (2018). The influence of teacher qualification in teaching chemistry in Brazil. Academia Journal of Educational Research, 6(2), 30-35.
  10. Archibong, A. U. (2009). The relative effectiveness of student-centered activity-based approach and lecture method on the cognitive achievements of integrated science students. Journal of Science Teachers Association of Nigeria, 32(1&2), 37-42.
  11. Ardac, D., & Akaygun, S. (2004). Effectiveness of multimedia-based instruction that emphasizes molecular representations on students’ understanding of chemical change. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(4), 317-337. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20005
  12. Barbour, M. K., & Reeves, T. C. (2009). The reality of virtual schools: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 52(2), 402-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.09.009
  13. Burrows, N. L., & Mooring, S. R. (2015). Using concept mapping to uncover students’ knowledge structures of chemical bonding concepts. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(1), 53-66. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RP00180J
  14. Carvalho-Knighton, K. M., & Keen-Rocha, L. (2007). Using technology to enhance the effectiveness of general chemistry laboratory courses. Journal of Chemical Education, 84(4), 727-730. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed084 p727
  15. Chang, R., & Goldsby, K. A. (2016). Chemistry. McGraw-Hill Education.
  16. Chen, B., & Wei, B. (2015). Investigating the factors that influence chemistry teachers’ use of curriculum materials: The case of China. Science Education International, 26(2), 195-216.
  17. Childs, P. E., & Sheehan, M. (2009). What’s difficult about chemistry? An Irish perspective. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 10, 204-218. https://doi.org/10.1039/b914499b
  18. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. SAGE.
  19. Desimone, L. M., Porter, A. C., Garet, S. M., Yoon, K. S., & Birman, B. F. (2002). Effects of professional development on teachers’ instruction: results from a three-year longitudinal study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2), 81-112. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737024002081
  20. Donkoh, S. (2017). What students say about senior high school organic chemistry. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 12(10), 2139-2152.
  21. Duda, H. J., Wahyuni, F. R. E., & Setyawan, A. E. (2020). Plant biotechnology: Studying the misconception of biology education students. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2296. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0030449
  22. Ealy, B. J., & Hermanson, J. (2006). Molecular images in organic chemistry: Assessment of understanding in aromaticity, symmetry, spectroscopy, and shielding. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(1), 59-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/sl0956-006-0356-5
  23. Ebbing, D. D., & Gammon, D. S. (2017). General chemistry. Cengage Learning.
  24. Ellis, J. W. (1994). How are we going to teach organic if the task force has its way? Some observations of an organic professor. Journal of Chemical Education, 71(5), 399-403. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed071p399
  25. Engida, T. (2014). Chemistry teacher professional development using the technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) framework. African Journal of Chemical Education, 4(3), 2-21.
  26. Ghana Statistical Service. (2021). 2021 population and housing census. Press release on provisional results. https://statsghana.gov.gh/gssmain/storage/img/infobank/2021%20PHC%20Provisional%20Results%20Press%20Release.pdf
  27. Goe, L. (2007). The link between teacher quality and student outcomes: A research synthesis. National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. http://www.ncctq.org/publications/LinkBetweenTQand StudentOutcomes.pdf
  28. Hanson, R. (2017). Enhancing students’ performance in organic chemistry through context-based learning and micro activities–A case study. European Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational Sciences, 5(6), 7-20.
  29. Holbrook, J. (2005). Making chemistry teaching relevant. Chemical Education International, 6(1), 1-12.
  30. Johnstone, A. H. (1991). Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7, 75-83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.1991.tb00230.x
  31. Johnstone, A. H. (2006). Chemical education research in Glasgow in perspective. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7(2), 49-63. https://doi.org/10.1039/B5RP90021B
  32. Johnstone, A. H. (2010). You can’t get there from here. Journal of Chemical Education, 87(7), 22-29. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed800026d
  33. Kartal, T., Ozturk, N., & Yalvac, H. G. (2011). Misconceptions of science teacher candidates about heat and temperature. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 2758-2763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.184
  34. Kay, C. C., & Yiin, H. K. (2010) Misconceptions in the teaching of chemistry in secondary schools in Singapore & Malaysia. In Proceedings of the Sunway Academic Conference.
  35. Keziah, A. A. (2011). Using computer in science class: The interactive effect of gender. Journal of African Studies and Development, 3(7), 131-134.
  36. Kind, V. (2009). Pedagogical content knowledge in science education: Perspectives and potential for progress. Studies in Science Education, 45(2), 169-204. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260903142285
  37. Klieme, E., Pauli, C., & Reusser, K. (2009). The Pythagoras study: Investigating effects of teaching and learning in Swiss and German mathematics classrooms. In T. Janik, & T. Seidel (Eds.), The power of video studies in investigating teaching and learning in the classroom (pp. 137-160). Waxmann Publishing Co.
  38. Margunayasa, I. G., Dantes, N., Marhaeni, A. A. I. N., & Suastra, I. W. (2019). The effect of guided inquiry learning and cognitive style on science. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 737-750. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12147a
  39. Metz, K. (1997). On the complex relation between cognitive development research and children’s science curricula. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 151-163. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543067001151
  40. Miheso, J., & Mavhunga, E. (2020). The retention of topic specific PCK: A longitudinal study with beginning chemistry teachers. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21, 789-805. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RP00008F
  41. Miller, M, D., Linn, R. L., & Gronlund, N. E. (2009). Measurement and assessment in teaching. Pearson Education Inc.
  42. MOE. (2010). Teaching syllabus for chemistry: Senior high school 1-3. Ministry of Education.
  43. Mubarak, S., & Yahdi, Y. (2020). Identifying undergraduate students’ misconceptions in understanding acid base materials. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(2), 276-286. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i2.23193
  44. Mudau, A. V. (2013). A conceptual framework for analysing teaching difficulties in the science classroom. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 4(13), 125-132. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2013.v4n13p125
  45. Nbina, J. B. (2012). Analysis of poor performance of senior secondary students in chemistry in Nigeria. An International Multidisciplinary Journal, Ethiopia, 6(4), 324-334. https://doi.org/10.4314/afrrev.v6i4.22
  46. NRC. (1997). Strengthening high school chemistry education through teacher outreach programs: A workshop summary to the chemical sciences round-table. National Research Council.
  47. O’Dwyer, A., & Childs, P. E. (2017). Who says organic chemistry is difficult? Exploring perspectives and perceptions. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3600-3620. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00748a
  48. Ogunleye, B. O., & Bamidele, A. D. (2013). Peer-led guided inquiry as an effective strategy for improving secondary school students’ performance and practical skills performance in chemistry. Journal of Studies in Science and Mathematics Education, 3(1), 33-46.
  49. Okorie, U. E., & Akubuilo, F. (2013). Towards improving quality of education in chemistry: An investigation into chemistry teachers’ knowledge of chemistry curriculum. International Journal of Emerging Science and Engineering, 1(9), 30-34.
  50. Omwirhiren, E. M. (2015). Enhancing the academic achievement and retention in senior secondary chemistry through discussion and lecture methods: A case study of some selected secondary schools in Gboko, Benue State, Nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(2), 155-161.
  51. Omwirhiren, E. M., & Ubanwa, O. A. (2016). An analysis of misconceptions in organic chemistry among selected senior secondary school students in Zaria local government area of Kaduna state, Nigeria. International Journal of Education and Research, 4(7), 247-266.
  52. Quadros, A. L., Da-Silva, D. C., Silva, F. C., Andrade, F. P., Aleme, H. G., Tristao, J. C., Oliveira, S. R., Santos, L. J., & Freitas-Silva, G. (2011). The knowledge of chemistry in secondary education: Difficulties from the teachers’ viewpoint. Educacion Quimica [Chemistry Education], 22(3), 232-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0187-893X(18)30139-3
  53. Rocard, M., Cesrmley, P., Jorde, D., Lenzen, D., Walberg-Herniksson, H., & Hemmo, V. (2007). Science education NOW: A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. http://ec.europa.eu/research/sciencesociety/document_library/pdf_06/report-rocard-on-science-education_en.pdf
  54. Rockoff, J. (2004). The impact of individual teachers on student achievement: evidence from panel data. The American Economic Review, 94(2), 247-252.https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828041302244
  55. Salame, I. I., Patel, S., & Suleman, S. (2019). Examining some of the students’ challenges in learning organic chemistry. International Journal of Chemistry Education Research, 3(1), 6-14. https://doi.org/10.20885/ijcer.vol3. iss1.art2
  56. Schmidt, H. J. (1992). Conceptual difficulties with isomerism. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(9), 995-1003. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660290908
  57. Seidel, T., & Shavelson, R. J. (2007). Teaching effectiveness research in the past decade: The role of theory and research design in disentangling meta-analysis results. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 454-499. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307310317
  58. Shulman, L. S. (1986) Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
  59. Sibomana, A., Karegeya, C., & Sentongo, J. (2021). Students’ conceptual understanding of organic chemistry and classroom implications in the Rwandan perspectives: A literature review. African Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics and Sciences, 16(2), 13-32. https://doi.org/10.4314/ajesms.v16i.2.2
  60. Sirhan, G. (2007). Learning difficulties in chemistry: An overview. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 4(2), 2-20.
  61. Smith, P. S., & Banilower, E. R. (2015). Assessing pedagogical content knowledge: a new application of the uncertainty principle. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 88-103). Routledge.
  62. Stein, M. K., Smith, M. S., & Silver, E. A. (1999). The development of professional developers: Learning to assist teachers in new settings in new ways. Harvard Educational Review, 69(3), 237-269. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.69.3.h2267130727v6878
  63. Stojanoyska, M., Mijic, I., & Petrusevski, V. M. (2020). Challenges and recommendations for improving chemistry education and teaching in the Republic of North Macedonia. CEPS Journal, 10(1), 145-166. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.732
  64. Sukarmin, Suparmi, & Ratnasari, D. (2017). The implementation of two-tier multiple choice (TTMC) to analyze students’ conceptual understanding profile on heat and temperature. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 158, 179-189. https://doi.org/10.2991/ictte-17.2017.41
  65. Supovitz, J. A., Mayers, D. P., & Kahle, J. B. (2000). Promoting inquiry-based instructional practice: the longitudinal impact of professional development in the context of systemic reform. Educational Policy, 14, 331-356. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904800014003001
  66. Swati, S. J., Chavan, R. L., & Khandagale, V. S. (2019). Identification of misconceptions in science: Tools, techniques & skills for teachers. Aarhat Multidisciplinary International Education Research Journal, 8(2), 466-472.
  67. Taber, K. (2002). Chemical misconceptions-prevention, diagnosis, and cure: Theoretical background. Royal Society of Chemistry.
  68. Uce, M., & Ceyhan, I. (2019). Misconception in chemistry education and practices to eliminate them: Literature analysis. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 7(3), 202-208. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets. v7i3.3990
  69. Udu, D. A. (2019). Efficacies of cooperative learning instructional approach, learning activity package, and lecture method in enhancing students’ academic retention in chemistry. Science Education International, 29(4), 220-227. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v29.i4.4
  70. Usman, K. O. (2011). Using guided scoring teaching strategy to improve students’ achievement in chemistry at secondary school level in Nigeria. Journal of the Science Teachers Association of Nigeria, 42(1&2), 60-65.
  71. Utami, R. A., & Muhtadi, A. (2020). TPACK-based e-book for learning chemistry in senior high school. Atlantis Press SARL. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200521.036
  72. Valanides, N. (2000). Primary student teachers’ understanding of the particulate nature of matter and its transformations during dissolving. Chemistry Education: Research and Practise in Europe, 1(2), 249-262. https://doi.org/10.1039/A9RP90026H
  73. Van Driel, J. H., Verloop, N., & de Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 673-695. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1098-2736(199808)35:6<673::aid-tea5>3.0.co;2-j
  74. von Aufschnaiter, C., & Rogge, C. (2010). Misconceptions or missing conceptions? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 6(1), 3-18. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75223
  75. Vosniadou, S., Ioannides, C. P., Dimitrakopoulou, A., & Papademetriou, E. (2001). Designing learning environments to promote conceptual change in science. Learning and Instruction, 11(4-5), 381-419. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-4752(00)00038-4
  76. Watson, K., Steele, F., Vozzo, L., & Aubusson, P. (2007). Changing the subject: Retraining teachers to teach science. Research in Science Education, 37(2), 141-154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9019-4
  77. Woldeamanuel, M. M., Atagana, H., & Engida, T. (2014). What makes chemistry difficult? African Journal of Chemical Education, 4(2), 31-43.